高级检索
Dosimetric comparison of CT-guided iodine-125 seed stereotactic brachytherapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy in the treatment of NSCLC

    作者

    Li, RR;Zhang, Y;Yuan, Y;Lin, Q;Dai, JJ;Xu, RC;Hu, XD;Han, MY

    作者单位

    [Li, Ranran; Zhang, Ying; Yuan, Yuan; Lin, Qi; Dai, Jianjian; Xu, Ruicai; Han, Mingyong] Shandong Univ, Shandong Prov Hosp, Canc Therapy & Res Ctr, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China.;-;[Hu, Xudong] Shandong Univ, Shandong Canc Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China.

    摘要

    This study aimed to assess the dosimetric differences between iodine-125 seed stereotactic brachytherapy (SBT) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). An SBT plan and an SBRT plan were generated for eleven patients with T1-2 NSCLC. Prescription of the dose and fractionation (fr) for SBRT was 48Gy/4fr. The planning aim for SBT was D90 (dose delivered to 90% of the target volume)>= 120Gy. Student's paired t test was used to compare the dosimetric parameters. The SBT and SBRT plans had comparable PTV D90 (104.73 +/- 2.10Gyvs. 107.64 +/- 2.29Gy), and similar mean volume receiving 100% of the prescription dose (V100%) (91.65% vs. 92.44%, p = 0.410). The mean volume receiving 150% of the prescribed dose (V150%) for SBT was 64.71%, whereas it was 0% for SBRT. Mean heterogeneity index (HI) deviation for SBT vs. SBRT was 0.73 vs. 0.19 (p<0.0001), and the mean conformity index (CI) for SBT vs. SBRT was 0.77 vs. 0.81 (p = 0.031). The mean lung doses (MLD) in SBT were significantly lower than those in SBRT (1.952 +/- 0.713 vs. 5.618 +/- 2.009, p<0.0001). In conclusion, compared with SBRT, SBT can generate a comparable dose within PTV, while the organs at risk (OARs) only receive a very low dose. But the HI and CI in SBT were lower than in SBRT.

    关键词

    CELL LUNG-CANCER; EARLY-STAGE; RADIOTHERAPY; IMPLANTS; PROSTATE
基本信息

  • 所属机构:

    归属医师: 林琦 袁苑 韩明勇 徐瑞彩 张颖1980 戴建建

    PMID:29121047

    UT:000414769900032

    刊名:PLOS ONE

    年,卷(期):2017年12卷11期

    DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0187390

    附件: pdf

    收录:   SCIE